Spokes.wiki Search About

Log — AI Governance Wiki

Append-only history. Entries start with ## [YYYY-MM-DD] <op> | <title>.

[2026-06-26] ingest | Akrites — industry OSS-security body (hub-routed)

Hub-routed Telegram drop (msg 599, thenewstack.io). WebFetch returned only page chrome twice → firecrawl fallback (HUB edge rule) to get the article body past the cookie banner. T3 (reputable trade press + Linux Foundation press-release backstop; one Endor stat unverified). Strong-fit ingest: the wiki already held the Fable 5/Mythos ban and the “controls don’t stop proliferation” critique that Akrites directly answers. Created akrites (Organization), akrites-launch-tns (NewsArticle source), and a thin linux-foundation venue node (the operational counterpart to ietf). Synthesis: added “governance by collective industry defense” as a new instrument — a second non-state venue (defense-side/operational vs IETF’s input-side rule-writing), the industry counterpart to the state’s export ban on the same incident, and the constructive corollary of the efficacy critique (harden targets vs gate the tool). Cross-linked the export-ban + efficacy pages. +3 pages.

[2026-06-07] split | ai-governance-wiki created from _inbox (3 sources)

Spun out of the hub ai-governance _inbox cluster once it reached 3 cohering sources (per ../HUB.md). Founding sources (all Telegram-dropped 2026-06-07): nemko-ai-governance-services (vendor AI-GRC + certification, aligned to EU AI Act / ISO 42001 / NIST RMF), israel-ai-regulation-overview (Israel’s sectoral soft-law regulatory framework), and israel-ai-strategy-2026 (Israel Innovation Authority’s national AI strategy, “Excellence Outweighs Scale,” April 2026 draft). Scaffolded raw/ + wiki/, CLAUDE.md from the hub template, and these spine files; added the registry block to ../wikis.md. The strategy PDF is held in raw/AI-Strategy-2026-ENG.pdf (the other two are URL-only). Founding page set: 3 source summaries + concept pages (ai-governance, eu-ai-act, iso-iec-42001, nist-ai-rmf, risk-based-regulation, responsible-innovation) + orgs (nemko-digital, israel-innovation-authority).

[2026-06-07] ingest | founding sources (Nemko, Israel regulation, Israel AI strategy)

Ingested the three cluster sources per Ingest. See synthesis for the thesis: AI governance spans an organizational axis (management-system standards, assurance, certification — Nemko) and a national axis (regulatory regimes + AI strategy — Israel), with a live tension between the EU’s horizontal binding law and Israel’s sectoral soft-law model. Israel’s two sources show the regulation/strategy pair: a risk-based, OECD-aligned, sandbox-driven approach that deliberately avoids an EU-style horizontal AI act to stay “export-ready.”

[2026-06-07] ingest | LoFrayer vs. Israel Bar Association (AI traffic-fine startup)

Hub-routed (Telegram, Calcalist/Ctech). New source lofrayer-bar-association (NewsArticle, url): the Israel Bar Association’s 72-hour ultimatum to shut LoFrayer (AI fine-appeal startup) for “unauthorized practice of law” under Section 20 of the 1961 Bar Association Law. New concept professional-licensing-and-ai (DefinedTerm) — a third governance vector: existing professional- licensing law as de facto AI regulation (distinct from new AI acts and national strategy), and the public-protection-vs-access/anti-monopoly tension. Updated israel-ai-regulation-overview (concrete instance of “existing statutes reinterpreted for AI”), ai-governance (new mechanism), and synthesis (new “regulation by existing law” section + new tension). Index: +1 concept, +1 source. Caveat: single news report of an unadjudicated 72-hour ultimatum.

[2026-06-09] ingest | +2 international standards (OECD AI Principles, CoE Framework Convention) — all-spokes cron test

Filled the “whose standards win?” open question with the international layer the spoke lacked: oecd-ai-principles (DefinedTerm, src — the first intergovernmental AI standard; the shared AI-system definition the EU Act / CoE treaty / US / UN all reuse; voluntary soft law) and framework-convention-on-ai (Legislation, src — Council of Europe; the first legally binding international treaty on AI, signed by EU+US+UK; principles-based, treaty not regulation). Reframed the binding tier as two shapes (product-regulation vs state-treaty) above the voluntary OECD/ISO/NIST tier. (UNESCO Ethics Recommendation attempted but its Wikipedia URL 404’d — deferred, not padded.) 13 → 15 pages.

[2026-06-10] ingest | China + US AI regulation — all-spokes pass (the fork becomes a 4-way map)

Two national regimes filling the “whose standards win / national models” gap. china-ai-regulation (DefinedTerm, source, Wikipedia Regulation-of-AI) — state-driven, content-binding: CAC algorithm registration (1,400+ filed by 2024), the 2023 Generative AI Interim Measures (one of the first national GenAI frameworks), and 2025 mandatory AI-content labeling/watermarking (the hard-law end of the provenance spectrum). us-ai-policy (DefinedTerm, source, same) — market-driven/fragmented: Biden 2023 safety-testing EO rescinded, Trump Dec-2025 EO preempting state laws (California/Colorado), no federal horizontal law. Together they turn the synthesis’s horizontal-vs-sectoral fork into a four-way instrument-philosophy map (EU rights-driven horizontal-binding · China state-driven content-binding · US market-driven fragmented · Israel innovation-driven sectoral-soft) and add a new federal-vs-subnational preemption axis (US). Convergence caveat holds — all lean on the oecd-ai-principles definitional substrate. Folded into synthesis (new 2026-06-10 section) + index (2 DefinedTerm rows). No contradictions. 15 → 17 pages.

[2026-06-12] ingest | UK AI regulation — “pro-innovation approach” (GOV.UK White Paper)

All-spokes daily expansion. Added uk-ai-regulation (@type DefinedTerm) — the fifth jurisdiction on the instrument-philosophy map (EU/China/US/Israel + UK). The UK is pro-innovation, cross-sector top-down: five central principles (safety-security-robustness; transparency/explainability; fairness; accountability/governance; contestability/redress) delegated to existing sector regulators, no single AI law. Key analytic payoff: shows “sectoral-soft” was two mechanics — UK top-down delegated principles vs Israel bottom-up statutory reinterpretation. Sharpens the “does soft law hold under pressure?” question (AI Safety→Security Institute rename Feb 2025; statutory frontier framework mooted 2026 = soft→binding drift). Convergence caveat intact (principles track oecd-ai-principles). Wired to eu-ai-act / responsible-innovation / us-ai-policy / china-ai-regulation; synthesis “four-way → five-way” note; index updated. 1 new page. Authoritative (UK government White Paper).

[2026-06-14] ingest | US export-control ban on Anthropic models (Fable 5 / Mythos 5) — TechCrunch

Routed from hub (Telegram drop). Reported US export-control crackdown (12 Jun 2026) on two Anthropic models, triggered by an Amazon-CEO→Treasury cyber-misuse report + a David Sacks “jailbreak” framing; Anthropic counters the capability “already exists in other public models.” Quality gate: tier T4 (trade press, heavily “reportedly”/secondhand — justified: breaking event, no primary/official source yet); soft-gate ingested with the contested-ness flagged. Not previously paged → new source summary anthropic-export-ban-2026 + new concept export-controls-on-ai (export control as a governance instrument — the lever beyond conduct rules). Gap-relevance: extends the instrument taxonomy and complicates the us-ai-policy “deregulatory” cell; integrated into us-ai-policy + synthesis (new instrument note + a “deregulatory yet interventionist” contradiction). Cross-spoke: the regulated models/providers (Anthropic/Amazon/Fable5/Mythos5) noted as llm-providers-wiki territory, not duplicated. freshness: volatile. url provenance. Site rebuild + commit follow.

[2026-06-18] ingest | The Free and Open Web Is Under Attack at the IETF (EFF)

Telegram-dropped; hub-routed here (runner-up: search-marketing-wiki — robots.txt/crawler access is SEO-adjacent, but the substance is AI policy, not search marketing). Source summary eff-web-under-attack-ietf (T2, advocacy POV; url provenance). New instrument: governance by technical standard — the ietf as a non-state venue writing AI access rules in protocol form, targeting AI’s inputs (training-data access) rather than conduct or distribution. Concept pages ai-preferences (robots.txt-evolution “don’t train” signals) + web-bot-auth (cryptographic bot ID with selective-access double-use). Gap-relevance: extends the instrument taxonomy with a first non-state venue + a first input-side lever; sharpens “Whose standards win?” into a new open question about who governs the open web. Integrated into synthesis (instruments-beyond-conduct-rules bullet, lineage 06-18, new open question) + ai-governance hub page. Entities (2/8 budget): electronic-frontier-foundation (NGO, publisher) + tori-noble (Person, author) — both new; IETF paged as subject Thing, not a discovered agent. Cross-spoke: output-side content labeling sits in china-ai-regulation; robots.txt/crawling overlaps search-marketing-wiki (noted, not duplicated). Site rebuild + commit follow.

[2026-06-18] ingest | DefinedTerm enrichment pass (subagent)

Thinnest-first deepening of DefinedTerm pages with fetched, authoritative sources. Sources fetched: NIST AI RMF official landing page (nist.gov, T1) + NIST AIRC trustworthiness characteristics page → new source summary nist-ai-rmf-overview; A-LIGN ISO 42001 explainer (a-lign.com, T2) → new source summary iso-42001-align-explainer; oecd.ai/en/ai-principles re-fetched (T1, already a source page). Enriched: nist-ai-rmf — added AI RMF 1.0 release date (2023-01-26), the four-function detail (Govern as cross-cutting; Map→Measure→Manage), the seven trustworthiness characteristics, and the GenAI Profile NIST-AI-600-1 (2024-07-26); stub note removed. iso-iec-42001 — added Annex A–D structure, the six PDCA requirement areas, and the not-yet-harmonized-vs-EU-AI-Act status; stub note removed. oecd-ai-principles — added the verbatim OECD AI-system definition and the May-2024 update rationale, explaining the definitional-substrate thesis. risk-based-regulation — sharpened the NIST entry and added an OECD-definition entry, both sourced. responsible-innovation — Related footer + OECD cross-link, no body padding (already developed). Index: new TechArticle source group with the two new pages. All [[links]] verified against existing slugs. Ran avoid-ai-writing over new prose. No build, no commit (orchestrator handles).

[2026-06-21] ingest | “From PGP to Mythos” — export-control efficacy critique (hub-routed)

Telegram drop (hub msg 546, TechCrunch). Adds the efficacy dimension export-controls-on-ai flagged as open: a 3-era history (PGP/Crypto Wars → spyware/Wassenaar → Mythos/AI) arguing cyber export controls don’t stop proliferation (relocation, non-signatory havens, enforcement discretion, capability replication; rare win = FinFisher 2022). New source cyber-export-control-history (TechArticle, T2 — thesis-driven; historical cases solid, the “it’ll fail again” prediction is the author’s). Deepened export-controls-on-ai with a “does it even work?” section + a 2nd open thread (governance theatre vs. buys-time); cross-linked anthropic-export-ban-2026 (the Mythos ban it critiques). Refresh-in-place, no new concept page. +1 page.

[2026-06-28] ingest | US restricts OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 access (The New Stack) — hub-routed

The export-control thread’s next beat. Two new source/Thing pages + three updates + two new entity nodes.

  • openai-gpt56-access-restriction (NewsArticle, T3, thenewstack.io) — White House limits GPT-5.6 to government-approved partners, approved customer-by-customer during preview (CNN + The Information
    • Altman staff Q&A); the 2nd lab hit two weeks after Anthropic.
  • eo-14409 (Legislation) — the instrument the Anthropic story lacked a name for: Executive Order 14409 (2 Jun 2026), 30-day pre-release submission of frontier models. Reframes the Anthropic ban as the first enforcement beat of a standing pre-release-review regime, not a one-off.
  • Entities: sam-altman (Person, OpenAI CEO — regulated-party voice) and the-new-stack (NewsMediaOrganization — recurring publisher; owner Insight Partners invests in OpenAI+Anthropic, disclosed conflict). Reused cross-wiki: openai, glm-52, david-sacks.
  • Updated us-ai-policy (security-lever exception → named-EO regime, 2 beats), export-controls-on-ai (Open Thread #1 “is it repeatable?” → partly resolved: yes, under EO 14409), anthropic-export-ban-2026 (new “instrument behind it” section), and synthesis (the security-lever bullet rewritten around the named, repeated regime + the efficacy/open-weight-accelerant thread).
  • Cross-spoke (llm-providers-wiki): access-denial on closed frontier models is a policy accelerant for open-weight/Chinese challengers (GLM-5.2 beats GPT-5.5 on coding, self-hostable) — noted as context, not duplicated. Caveat recorded: per-model application is secondhand; EO text is the verifiable kernel.

[2026-06-28] ingest | GPT-5.6 Preview system card (OpenAI) — hub-routed

The primary source the GPT-5.6 thread was missing. New source + new Thing page + four updates.

  • gpt56-system-card (Report, source, T1, deploymentsafety.openai.com) — OpenAI’s official system card (variants Sol/Terra/Luna): High in Cybersecurity + High in Biological/Chemical under the Preparedness Framework (Below High self-improvement; none Critical); cyber = finds vulns/exploit fragments but no autonomous end-to-end attacks (+ a noted agentic “exceeds user intent” regression); bio = 3/4 wet-lab-troubleshooting evals above High (novice uplift) but below Critical on protein design/novel pathogens; mitigations = activation classifiers that intervene mid-generation + 700k+ GPU-hr red-teaming; benchmarks HealthBench 60.5 (↑ from 51.8). States “government coordination was requested before broader deployment.”
  • preparedness-framework (DefinedTerm) — OpenAI’s internal capability risk-tiering as a frontier-lab self-governance instrument; contrasted with public standards (nist-ai-rmf, iso-iec-42001) — self-authored, self-graded, no independent auditor.
  • Updated openai-gpt56-access-restriction (primary-source corroboration section: capability + government-coordination now provider-documented; only the per-customer mechanism stays secondhand), export-controls-on-ai (open thread #1 — contested-facts problem easing on the capability side for GPT-5.6), eo-14409 (provider-side confirmation of the gate), and synthesis (new thread (c): the capability premise is provider-documented; lab’s internal gate sits alongside the state’s external gate; self-assessment caveat).
  • Routing: dominant substance = safety/preparedness/assurance (responsible-AI) → here; runner-up llm-providers-wiki (the model/benchmarks: Sol/Terra/Luna, HealthBench) noted as cross-spoke, not duplicated. Caveat recorded: T1 but a self-assessment (authoritative on what was tested, self-interested on framing). Entity openai reused cross-wiki; no new entity nodes.

[2026-07-03] ingest | Anthropic models revived — first completed EO-14409 cycle (Axios)

Msg 721 (axios.com/2026/07/03/anthropic-ai-models-revived-behind-the-scenes, via Telegram). WebFetch 403’d (Axios hard-block) → fetched via firecrawl. T2 (reputable outlet, named reporters Curi/Isenstadt/Gold; but load-bearing narrative is anonymous “U.S. official”/“source familiar” on a contested political story — weight the sequence over any actor’s motive). This is the resolution chapter of the June export ban: Fable 5 / Mythos 5 back online 1 July 2026 after a 20-day showdown. New source anthropic-models-revived-2026 + 2 entities: caisi (GovernmentOrganization — the US frontier-model evaluator that, with the NSA, gated the release) and howard-lutnick (Person — Commerce Sec who made the 12 June call taking the models offline). Did not re-page Anthropic/Amodei/Fable-5 (canonical in research-wiki — cross-linked, not duplicated); Bessent/Brown/Heck/Cairncross named inline, not paged (entity cap + governance-relevance). Governance substance: first full ban→review→re-release loop of the eo-14409 regime, which revealed the regime is only half a process — defined entry (submit 30 days out), undefined discretionary exit (approval); the article’s own bottom line is the approval “framework with transparency standards and timelines” still doesn’t exist. Folded into synthesis (export-control instrument thread + a new open question on the approval half), eo-14409 (new “first completed cycle” section), anthropic-export-ban-2026 (resolution note — and the trigger got more contested via the experts’ open letter). +3 pages. Ran avoid-ai-writing. Per-route verify deferred (routine ingest, no structural page move).

Related pages

Links to