ai-governance-wiki

Log — AI Governance Wiki

Append-only history. Entries start with ## [YYYY-MM-DD] <op> | <title>.

[2026-06-07] split | ai-governance-wiki created from _inbox (3 sources)

Spun out of the hub ai-governance _inbox cluster once it reached 3 cohering sources (per ../HUB.md). Founding sources (all Telegram-dropped 2026-06-07): nemko-ai-governance-services (vendor AI-GRC + certification, aligned to EU AI Act / ISO 42001 / NIST RMF), israel-ai-regulation-overview (Israel’s sectoral soft-law regulatory framework), and israel-ai-strategy-2026 (Israel Innovation Authority’s national AI strategy, “Excellence Outweighs Scale,” April 2026 draft). Scaffolded raw/ + wiki/, CLAUDE.md from the hub template, and these spine files; added the registry block to ../wikis.md. The strategy PDF is held in raw/AI-Strategy-2026-ENG.pdf (the other two are URL-only). Founding page set: 3 source summaries + concept pages (ai-governance, eu-ai-act, iso-iec-42001, nist-ai-rmf, risk-based-regulation, responsible-innovation) + orgs (nemko-digital, israel-innovation-authority).

[2026-06-07] ingest | founding sources (Nemko, Israel regulation, Israel AI strategy)

Ingested the three cluster sources per Ingest. See synthesis for the thesis: AI governance spans an organizational axis (management-system standards, assurance, certification — Nemko) and a national axis (regulatory regimes + AI strategy — Israel), with a live tension between the EU’s horizontal binding law and Israel’s sectoral soft-law model. Israel’s two sources show the regulation/strategy pair: a risk-based, OECD-aligned, sandbox-driven approach that deliberately avoids an EU-style horizontal AI act to stay “export-ready.”

[2026-06-07] ingest | LoFrayer vs. Israel Bar Association (AI traffic-fine startup)

Hub-routed (Telegram, Calcalist/Ctech). New source lofrayer-bar-association (NewsArticle, url): the Israel Bar Association’s 72-hour ultimatum to shut LoFrayer (AI fine-appeal startup) for “unauthorized practice of law” under Section 20 of the 1961 Bar Association Law. New concept professional-licensing-and-ai (DefinedTerm) — a third governance vector: existing professional- licensing law as de facto AI regulation (distinct from new AI acts and national strategy), and the public-protection-vs-access/anti-monopoly tension. Updated israel-ai-regulation-overview (concrete instance of “existing statutes reinterpreted for AI”), ai-governance (new mechanism), and synthesis (new “regulation by existing law” section + new tension). Index: +1 concept, +1 source. Caveat: single news report of an unadjudicated 72-hour ultimatum.

[2026-06-09] ingest | +2 international standards (OECD AI Principles, CoE Framework Convention) — all-spokes cron test

Filled the “whose standards win?” open question with the international layer the spoke lacked: oecd-ai-principles (DefinedTerm, src — the first intergovernmental AI standard; the shared AI-system definition the EU Act / CoE treaty / US / UN all reuse; voluntary soft law) and framework-convention-on-ai (Legislation, src — Council of Europe; the first legally binding international treaty on AI, signed by EU+US+UK; principles-based, treaty not regulation). Reframed the binding tier as two shapes (product-regulation vs state-treaty) above the voluntary OECD/ISO/NIST tier. (UNESCO Ethics Recommendation attempted but its Wikipedia URL 404’d — deferred, not padded.) 13 → 15 pages.

[2026-06-10] ingest | China + US AI regulation — all-spokes pass (the fork becomes a 4-way map)

Two national regimes filling the “whose standards win / national models” gap. china-ai-regulation (DefinedTerm, source, Wikipedia Regulation-of-AI) — state-driven, content-binding: CAC algorithm registration (1,400+ filed by 2024), the 2023 Generative AI Interim Measures (one of the first national GenAI frameworks), and 2025 mandatory AI-content labeling/watermarking (the hard-law end of the provenance spectrum). us-ai-policy (DefinedTerm, source, same) — market-driven/fragmented: Biden 2023 safety-testing EO rescinded, Trump Dec-2025 EO preempting state laws (California/Colorado), no federal horizontal law. Together they turn the synthesis’s horizontal-vs-sectoral fork into a four-way instrument-philosophy map (EU rights-driven horizontal-binding · China state-driven content-binding · US market-driven fragmented · Israel innovation-driven sectoral-soft) and add a new federal-vs-subnational preemption axis (US). Convergence caveat holds — all lean on the oecd-ai-principles definitional substrate. Folded into synthesis (new 2026-06-10 section) + index (2 DefinedTerm rows). No contradictions. 15 → 17 pages.

[2026-06-12] ingest | UK AI regulation — “pro-innovation approach” (GOV.UK White Paper)

All-spokes daily expansion. Added uk-ai-regulation (@type DefinedTerm) — the fifth jurisdiction on the instrument-philosophy map (EU/China/US/Israel + UK). The UK is pro-innovation, cross-sector top-down: five central principles (safety-security-robustness; transparency/explainability; fairness; accountability/governance; contestability/redress) delegated to existing sector regulators, no single AI law. Key analytic payoff: shows “sectoral-soft” was two mechanics — UK top-down delegated principles vs Israel bottom-up statutory reinterpretation. Sharpens the “does soft law hold under pressure?” question (AI Safety→Security Institute rename Feb 2025; statutory frontier framework mooted 2026 = soft→binding drift). Convergence caveat intact (principles track oecd-ai-principles). Wired to eu-ai-act / responsible-innovation / us-ai-policy / china-ai-regulation; synthesis “four-way → five-way” note; index updated. 1 new page. Authoritative (UK government White Paper).

[2026-06-14] ingest | US export-control ban on Anthropic models (Fable 5 / Mythos 5) — TechCrunch

Routed from hub (Telegram drop). Reported US export-control crackdown (12 Jun 2026) on two Anthropic models, triggered by an Amazon-CEO→Treasury cyber-misuse report + a David Sacks “jailbreak” framing; Anthropic counters the capability “already exists in other public models.” Quality gate: tier T4 (trade press, heavily “reportedly”/secondhand — justified: breaking event, no primary/official source yet); soft-gate ingested with the contested-ness flagged. Not previously paged → new source summary anthropic-export-ban-2026 + new concept export-controls-on-ai (export control as a governance instrument — the lever beyond conduct rules). Gap-relevance: extends the instrument taxonomy and complicates the us-ai-policy “deregulatory” cell; integrated into us-ai-policy + synthesis (new instrument note + a “deregulatory yet interventionist” contradiction). Cross-spoke: the regulated models/providers (Anthropic/Amazon/Fable5/Mythos5) noted as llm-providers-wiki territory, not duplicated. freshness: volatile. url provenance. Site rebuild + commit follow.